🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #52191

which -f options are the best?

#52191
From: Paul Crowley
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1993 01:48
9 lines
945 bytes
I'd like to compile my code for most serious optimisation.  In addition
to -O, gcc offers options like -fstrength-reduce, which perform other
optimisations I don't wholly understand.  If I just do -O, do the
appropriate ones get done anyway?

advaTHANKSnce,
  __                                  _____
\/ o\ Paul Crowley   pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk \\ //
/\__/ Trust me. I know what I'm doing. \X/ 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <C1110u.8q7@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!pdc

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,8f5ca2f2e32384f3,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-01-17 17:48:30 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!pdc
From: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: which -f options are the best?
Message-ID: <C1110u.8q7@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 18 Jan 93 01:48:30 GMT
Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
Reply-To: pdc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Paul Crowley)
Organization: Edinburgh University
Lines: 9