Re: SCCS strings embedded in code with -Wall

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #52206

#52206

From: Harald Fuchs
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 15:25

15 lines
1565 bytes

In article <1993Jan18.171516.19966@picker.com>, parma@picker.com (Mike Parma) writes:

> The problem with the above solution is that now 'print_version' is
> a global function that might conflict with another '.c' file that
> contained the same construct.  This is not much different from removing
> the 'static' declaration from 'rcsid'.  And of course if you declare
> 'print_version' as 'static' then the function is not used :).  

How about compiling with -Wall -Dlint and putting #ifdef lint around
the static definition?
Since gcc -Wall makes most of lint obsolete, it might even be a
reasonable idea to let gcc define lint when called with -Wall.
--

Harald Fuchs <hf@tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <HF.93Jan19152555@whyaduck.tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!hf

References: <1993Jan15.201556.9105@picker.com> <bkFYsLbr@twinsun.com> <1993Jan18.171516.19966@picker.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,cb44527f7ddf772a
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-01-19 09:42:49 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!hf
From: hf@tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de (Harald Fuchs)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Re: SCCS strings embedded in code with -Wall
Date: 19 Jan 93 15:25:55
Organization: Karlsruhe University, Germany
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <HF.93Jan19152555@whyaduck.tk.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de>
References: <1993Jan15.201556.9105@picker.com> <bkFYsLbr@twinsun.com>
 <1993Jan18.171516.19966@picker.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: whyaduck.telematik.informatik.uni-karlsruhe.de
In-reply-to: parma@picker.com's message of Mon, 18 Jan 1993 17:15:16 GMT

Reply to Parent Message