Re: Does gcc 2.2.2.2 really work, or should I roll back?

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #52330

#52330

From: Simon Langley
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1992 19:58

14 lines
1282 bytes

Don Steiny (steiny@steiny.com) wrote:
: 	Notably, I cannot compile any program with the user.h structure in it.
: And, I cannot compile make-3.63.   That is sort of surprising.   It barfs
: on header files.   I have an SVR4 system.   Is SVR4 just too new for 
: 
I have similar problems.  I ran fixincludes-V4 which reduced the header
problems, but definitely did not do away with them.  I would be very 
interested to hear from anyone who has managed to hack the ESIX headers
so that they have no problems with them.

-- 
   Simon Langley                   (preferred)   slangley@constant.demon.co.uk
   Hampstead, London
   pgp 2.0 public key available                  slangley@cix.compulink.co.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BynE5u.4F9@constant.demon.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!constant.demon.co.uk!slangley

References: <180@steiny.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,d9267046026f3f3
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-12-03 19:57:15 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!constant.demon.co.uk!slangley
From: slangley@constant.demon.co.uk (Simon Langley)
Subject: Re: Does gcc 2.2.2.2 really work, or should I roll back?
Message-ID: <BynE5u.4F9@constant.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Home
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
References: <180@steiny.com>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1992 19:58:42 GMT
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message