🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #52920

Which ld for Sparcs?

#52920
From: Ross Huitt
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1992 16:29
10 lines
946 bytes
What is the appropriate linker to use for _all_ cases
when using gcc2.1 with SunOS4.1.1(Sparc)?  If I use /usr/bin/ld,
static constructors (ala C++) fail to work. If I use gld-1.94 or collect2-2.1
I run into 'lib***.so.1' not found messages (in some situations),
but the C++ stuff works fine.

What's the best strategy to get around this problem?

Ross Huitt
bytor@ctt.bellcore.com
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Apr20.162914.10662@walter.bellcore.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!rutgers!bellcore!walter!grumpy!bytor

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,a11f0ba33bb81348,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-04-20 09:29:14 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!rutgers!bellcore!walter!grumpy!bytor
From: bytor@grumpy.bellcore.com (Ross Huitt)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Which ld for Sparcs?
Message-ID: <1992Apr20.162914.10662@walter.bellcore.com>
Date: 20 Apr 92 16:29:14 GMT
Sender: bytor@grumpy (Ross Huitt)
Organization: Bellcore
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: grumpy.ctt.bellcore.com