dbx & gcc2.1

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #52954

#52954

From: Richard Stallman
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1992 15:32

11 lines
1113 bytes

      2.1
    makes it so that xdbx often thinks it can't proceed using "step" but
    if you have set an appropriate breakpoint then "cont" works.  Seems to
    me that 2.1 is not an improvement.

I'm sad to hear this.  But what you are doing--posting vague
grumbles that aren't useful--is not constructive criticism.

If you care about getting this bug fixed, then you should do your
share of the work: write a usable bug report that shows GCC
maintainers what they need to know to find and fix the problem.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9204242332.AA17140@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms

References: <1619@arccs1.fed.FRB.GOV>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,2a10a7cb42661110
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-04-24 08:32:08 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
Subject: dbx & gcc2.1
Message-ID: <9204242332.AA17140@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
References: <1619@arccs1.fed.FRB.GOV>
Distribution: gnu
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1992 15:32:08 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message