🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #53149

Re: GCC-2.0 - will it be ported to Pyramid?

#53149
From: Shumate Jason
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1992 00:04
38 lines
2923 bytes
In article <1992Feb27.105715.1782@sics.se>, tege@sics.se (Torbjorn Granlund) writes:
> I asked a year ago in this group if anyone would offer free access
> (over the internet) to a modern Pyramid for doing a gcc 2 port.  I
> only got two offers to use very old 90x machines (which are not
> appropriate).  I decided to drop the project, since the interest was
> so small.  Another reason for dropping it was that I could not get
> pipeline info from pyramid, making good insn schedluling hard.
> 
> What needs to be done is to fix the trampoline stuff (for non-local
I wish I could help with internet access for a Pyramid, but my employers
would never let me do that.  What exactly do you mean by a "modern Pyramid"?
If you mean a MIPS-based MIServer T-series, that will do most of us Pyramid
users no good.  Why are 90x machines inappropriate?  All Pyramid computers
EXCEPT the MIServer T-series share the same processor.  If you can get GCC
version 2 to run on a 90x, I can use it on my 9805.  Might you be referring
to the operating system rather than the machine?  An incredibly large number
of Pyramid computers are running very old versions of OSx, the operating
system.  As I stated in my original post, you have different problems running
G++ depending on what version of OSx you have.  G++ currently can only be
run on old versions of OSx (sigh).

> gotos), to make stdargs/varargs obey the pyramid calling conventions,
> and optionally make insn schedluling work.
> 
stdargs/varargs was patched to get G++ to run on old versions of OSx.  I don't
have an old version of OSx.  Now the @#$% linker won't work.

> To port the GNU linker is not very hard.

Maybe not to you, but frankly, I am too dumb to do it.  It is beyond my
abilities to do it.  Brain surgery is not hard for brain surgeons to do
either.  Even though you mean well, saying it is not hard to do doesn't help
me get it done.  Thanks for responding anyway.  
-- 
CUL8R,                                | Unknown Actor:"Sounds like a lot of 
Jason Shumate                         |   supernatural baloney to me."
System Administrator, wrdis02         | Bela Lugosi:"Supernatural, perhaps. 
jshumate@logdis1.wr.aflc.af.mil       |   Baloney, perhaps not."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1795@wrdis01.af.mil>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!wrdis01!jshumate
References: <1786@wrdis01.af.mil> <1992Feb27.105715.1782@sics.se>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,d5cd955aa5c63295
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: 102ad9,3c4d8aef8e37148b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid102ad9,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-27 16:34:13 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!mips!wrdis01!jshumate
From: jshumate@wrdis01.af.mil ( Shumate Jason)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help,comp.sys.pyramid
Subject: Re: GCC-2.0 - will it be ported to Pyramid?
Message-ID: <1795@wrdis01.af.mil>
Date: 28 Feb 92 00:04:54 GMT
References: <1786@wrdis01.af.mil> <1992Feb27.105715.1782@sics.se>
Followup-To: gnu.gcc.help
Organization: 1926CCSG Robins AFB
Lines: 38