🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9203021932.AA03268@ipsi.darmstadt.gmd.de>, dack@darmstadt.gmd.de (Sven Dack) writes:
> 
> When I installed the GCC 2.0 I ran into trouble with the comparing of the cccp.o
> files.
> I did not expect that the officially released GCC 2.0 compiler runs as reliable
> as the Sun C compiler, but having serious problems even during the installation
> of GNU software on a common kind of computer (a Sparc 2) scared me a bit. After
> some netnews reading I found out that I am not the only one, who made this
> experience with the GCC 2.0.
> I though that you have tested the GCC 2.0, or at least the installation process?

   This is strictly not true.  I believed the distribution has been well
tested on most of the target machines before going to the public.  I have
compiled gcc from version 1.35 to the current 2.00 and have not a single
problem regardless of whether I did it on the sun3 or the sun4/sparc.
I think most errors were the result of not reading the installation
info throughly and do what it recommends.  Unless you got different
set of instruction from me.  You should be able to compile it.

-Won Soon
-- 
    INTERNET: engp1186@nuscc.nus.sg                           -x-|---|-x-     
    BITNET:   ENGP1186@NUSVM                                   | |   | |      
    MA' BELL:                 (+65) 772 6319                   --+-x-+--      
    SNAIL-MAIL:        VLSI DESIGN & CAD LABORATORY              | | |        
                      Dept of Electrical Engineering             | --|---     
                     National University of Sinagpore            |   | |      
                 10, Kent Ridge Crescent. Singapore 0511.      --+---+-x      
                                                               | |   |        
               SSI, MSI, LSI, VLSI, ULSI, WSI. What's next?   -x-|---|---