🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <TOMW.92Mar4123856@latchup.ucsb.edu> tomw@bears.ece.ucsb.edu writes:
>In article <A33092@AC.maus.de>, Marc_Van-Woerkom@ac.maus.de (Marc Van-Woerkom) writes:
>
>>te> My questions are: why does it do this?  Can I do anything to make them
>>te> work correctly together?
>
>> Name mangling is different on different compilers! (No bug - a fact of life)
>
>Huh?  This seems idiotic to me.  That means I can't use C++ libs
>compiled with a different compiler?  I'm outraged!  C doesn't have these
>kinds of problems.
>
>> Try to use the extern "C" statements.
>
>That's really horrible.  I'd have to find out the mangled names, and use
>those?  Ick.

On the brighter side, I fixed GDB to understand cfront mangled names.
My version of cfront mangles templates by appending __pt__ to the 
class names, and then the mangled types inside the <..>. Can someone
with access to cfront 3.0 tell me how it is done there?

Please don't ask me for patches yet, I am still testing it.

Thanks,

christos