🚀 go-pugleaf

While we're on the subject of name mangling, I thought I'd ask the
following question.  I think I know the answer, but I haven't seen any
direct statement:
	Is g++ 2.0 "compatible" with cfront as shipped from AT&T (or
sun) on a sparc?  By compatible, I mean can I mix and match objects
from the the two of them and expect things to work?

I gather the answer is no, they are only compatible on the source code
level, but have different name mangling, virtual function table
assignment, and other incompatibilities so I must either use cfront or
g++, but not both.

Some simple experiments seem to indicate that this is the case.  I'd
like to know if this is a bug in some planned compatibility, or if it
is beyond the scope of g++ and I shouldn't try to mix the two.

Thanks a bunch for your time,

Warner
-- 
Warner Losh		imp@Solbourne.COM	  MMP to DoD #882
"You better stay away from him, he'll rip your lungs out Jim,
 He's looking for James Taylor" -- Warewolves of Boulder WZ