🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #53315

gcc 2.0 doc is prelim draft?

#53315
From: Greg Lehmann
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1992 05:45
10 lines
1062 bytes
When can we expect the real 2.0 documentation, or is the front page
preliminary draft note a mistake? A rough ETA would be great. I don't
really want to waste 300+ pages of paper if it will come out next week!

thanks in advance for an answer and for gcc 2.0 itself.
-- 
Greg Lehmann,
CSIRO Division of Manufacturing Technology,   Telephone: +61 7 365 3877
c/- Dept. of Mining & Metallurgical Eng.,     Facsimile: +61 7 365 3711
The University of Queensland, QLD 4072.       Internet:  grl@brb.dmt.csiro.au
Technical Details
Message-ID: <grl.699169524@groucho>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!groucho!grl

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,be435b030dde7d9c,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-26 22:05:34 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!groucho!grl
From: grl@brb.dmt.csiro.au (Greg Lehmann)
Subject: gcc 2.0 doc is prelim draft?
Message-ID: <grl.699169524@groucho>
Sender: news@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (USENET News System)
Organization: Prentice Centre, University of Queensland
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 1992 05:45:24 GMT
Lines: 10