Re: One example where gcc 2.1 is worse than 1.37.1

Article View: gnu.gcc.help

Article #71

#71

From: Steve Hocking
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 04:23

19 lines
963 bytes

ajayshah@alhena.usc.edu (Ajay Shah) writes:

>Flags for old: -O
>Flags for new: -static -O2 -funroll-loops

>Ajay Shah, (213)749-8133, ajayshah@usc.edu

	I beleive that in the doco it says that -funroll-loops will often
decrease the speed of the generated code. Just try -O2 and maybe
-fschedule-insns2

	Cheers,

	Stephen
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Love makes the world go around, but sex makes the ride fun"
		Stephen Hocking - Unix consultant
shocking@cxbne.cx.oz.au			-	I am responsible for myself...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr7.042329.20611@cxbne.cx.OZ.AU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!cxbne!shocking

References: <ku1sa7INNnl8@alhena.usc.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!cxbne!shocking
From: shocking@cxbne.cx.OZ.AU (Steve Hocking)
Subject: Re: One example where gcc 2.1 is worse than 1.37.1
Organization: Comperex Australia Pty Limited
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1992 04:23:29 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Apr7.042329.20611@cxbne.cx.OZ.AU>
References: <ku1sa7INNnl8@alhena.usc.edu>

Reply to Parent Message