Article View: gnu.gcc.help
Article #841Re: SUGGESTION: Include libg++ in the next version of gcc.
From: Jurgen Botz
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 02:18
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 02:18
15 lines
1121 bytes
1121 bytes
>keith@msmri.med.ubc.ca writes: >> >> Since gcc-lib is included in gcc-2.3.2 why not include g++-lib >> in future releases of gcc. This would make installation of gcc >> much easier. This doesn't make any sense... gcc-lib isn't an equivalent of libg++, glibc is... and it isn't included either. Besides, how would packaging the two together simplify installation? What you really want is for the gcc distribution to use the Cygnus GNU-tools directory layout, and that will presumably happen one of these days. But they still shouldn't be packaged in a single tar file... that would be rediculous. -- Jurgen Botz, jbotz@mtholyoke.edu Northampton, MA, USA
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1it9p1INNe7t@slab.mtholyoke.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.mtholyoke.edu!jbotzReferences:
<1gqc0gINN3b6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <amos.726773731@sol>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.mtholyoke.edu!jbotz From: jbotz@mtholyoke.edu (Jurgen Botz) Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.help Subject: Re: SUGGESTION: Include libg++ in the next version of gcc. Date: 11 Jan 1993 21:18:09 -0500 Organization: Mount Holyoke College Lines: 15 Sender: news@mtholyoke.edu Message-ID: <1it9p1INNe7t@slab.mtholyoke.edu> References: <1gqc0gINN3b6@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> <amos.726773731@sol> NNTP-Posting-Host: slab.mtholyoke.edu