🚀 go-pugleaf

Mads Westermann (wes@dd.dk) wrote:
: Sometime ago there was a discussion on a problem involving the
: definition of __STDC__ in gcc versus cc on SCO 3.2.4. I have now
: run into the problem and cannot remember what the solution was !!
: 
: If there's somebody out there that has the solution I'd be very
: interested in hearing about it.

To make sure it works for me with K&R code, I do:

CC = gcc
CFLAGS = \
	-traditional -D__STDC__=0 \
	-D_NO_PROTOTYPE -D_SVID -D_KR \
	-DM_BITFIELDS -DM_COFF -DM_I386 -DM_I86 -DM_I86SM \
	-DM_INTERNAT -DM_SDATA -DM_STEXT -DM_SYS3 -DM_SYS5 \
	-DM_SYSIII -DM_SYSV -DM_UNIX -DM_WORDSWAP -DM_XENIX -Dunix -Di386

This gives no way to recalcitrant header files or to various
gcc configuration philosophies.

Chip Salzberg has provided a configuration for gcc which obviates
the need for *most* of the above, but not all.  The above make *sure*
even if you have not received the benefit of Chip's wisdom.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Warren Tucker  (404)587-5766              n4hgf!wht or wht@n4hgf.Mt-Park.GA.US
All readers cannot be leaders, but all leaders must be readers. - Harry Truman