🚀 go-pugleaf

  OK, with the help of a few netters, I believe I have finally
constructed a standalone gcc dev sys for SCO UNIX.  The question
now is, what am I legally allowed to distribute?

  The only stuff that appears to be illegal to post to the net
is any of the "fixed" header files that are SCO-proprietary, but
that's OK since the glibc will have its own header files.
However, in the gcc include directory that the SCO fixed headers
are in, there are many other files that are not SCO.  I'm assuming
these are identified by not having "Santa Cruz" copyrights at the
top.

  So what I was planning to do was package as, ld, glibc and all
of gcc, EXCEPT FOR any header files that have Santa Cruz copyrights
at the top.  I'll just delete those, the remaining header files
should be fine, yes?  Or am I safe to delete everything in the
gcc include directory and run solely off the header files that
come with glibc?

  Comments welcome before I do anything that will get me strung
up by my privates.  As soon as I'm confident what I'm doing is legal,
this stuff will be downloaded to digibd.com.

R. Day