Patch to patch

Article View: gnu.gdb.bug

Article #10170

#10170

From: Jim Kingdon
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 1990 18:56

14 lines
985 bytes

In case it wasn't obvious, "stsize" in the following part of the patch
I sent out yesterday should have been "buffer".  (I mean, "buffer"
obviously is the size of the string table, right :-)?).

***************
*** 1622,1627 ****
--- 1622,1628 ----
  #endif
        stringtab = (char *) xmalloc (buffer);
        symfile_string_table = stringtab;
+       symfile_string_table_size = stsize;
      }
    else
      stringtab = NULL;

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9004061856.AA11544@pogo>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AI.MIT.EDU!kingdon

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f5053,4e1da5b9aac75a9a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5053,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1990-04-06 11:56:03 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcsun!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!AI.MIT.EDU!kingdon
From: kingdon@AI.MIT.EDU (Jim Kingdon)
Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug
Subject: Patch to patch
Message-ID: <9004061856.AA11544@pogo>
Date: 6 Apr 90 18:56:03 GMT
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 14
Posted: Fri Apr  6 19:56:03 1990