🚀 go-pugleaf

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000105070800060407090801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I am using gdb version "GNU gdb 6.8-debian" from an IDE I am writing.

I noticed what seems to me an inconsistency in replies using MI/2. If I 
send then command "stack-list-frames", the reply is something like:

^done,stack=[frame={level="0",addr="0x080533d2",func="ONEOFPAR",file="xfpide.pas",fullname="/mnt/data/Appl/linux/fpcgui/xfpide.pas",line="44"},frame={level="1",addr="0x08053923",func="main",file="xfpide.pas",fullname="/mnt/data/Appl/linux/fpcgui/xfpide.pas",line="145"}]

_The "stack" value contains a list of "frame" values_. When I send the 
command "stack-list-locals 1", the reply is:

^done,locals=[{name="result",value="-1215643660"},{name="ONEOFPAR",value="-1215643660"},{name="RESULT",value="-1215643660"}]

_The "locals" value is a comma-separated list of unnamed values_.

This is not an important issue, but I would like to understand why the 
two cases use different structures... wouldn't it be better to use a 
more uniform syntax? In the second case, a form like 
[local={name="..",value="..."},local={}...] would be uniform and open to 
future additions.

Thanks for your attention, and regards.

Doriano Blengino


--------------000105070800060407090801
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi,<br>
<br>
I am using gdb version "GNU gdb 6.8-debian" from an IDE I am writing.<br>
<br>
I noticed what seems to me an inconsistency in replies using MI/2. If I
send then command "stack-list-frames", the reply is something like:<br>
<br>
<tt>^done,stack=[frame={level="0",addr="0x080533d2",func="ONEOFPAR",file="xfpide.pas",fullname="/mnt/data/Appl/linux/fpcgui/xfpide.pas",line="44"},frame={level="1",addr="0x08053923",func="main",file="xfpide.pas",fullname="/mnt/data/Appl/linux/fpcgui/xfpide.pas",line="145"}]</tt><br>
<br>
<u>The "stack" value contains a list of "frame" values</u>. When I send
the command "stack-list-locals 1", the reply is:<br>
<br>
<tt>^done,locals=[{name="result",value="-1215643660"},{name="ONEOFPAR",value="-1215643660"},{name="RESULT",value="-1215643660"}]</tt><br>
<br>
<u>The "locals" value is a comma-separated list of unnamed values</u>.<br>
<br>
This is not an important issue, but I would like to understand why the
two cases use different structures... wouldn't it be better to use a
more uniform syntax? In the second case, a form like
[local={name="..",value="..."},local={}...] would be uniform and open
to future additions.<br>
<br>
Thanks for your attention, and regards.<br>
<br>
Doriano Blengino<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------000105070800060407090801--