🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.gdb.bug
Article #407

problem with inner procedures in gdb

#407
From: Peggy Fieland
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 14:30
145 lines
5233 bytes
I am running gdb-4.6 on a stratus i860.

In  the course of integrating pascal support into gdb, I discovered
that gdb-4.6 does not handle the symbolic information for inner
procedures properly.

Here is the sample debugging session:

 gdbx ~/tests/nested
GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it
 under certain conditions; type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB; type "show warranty" for details.
GDB 4.6 MLF modified 8/31/91, Copyright 1992 Free Software Foundation, Inc...
Setting up the environment for debugging gdb.
Function "fatal" not defined.
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 01AB0H: file /home3/Languages/regression/gdb/pascal/source/nested.pascal, line 5.
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home2/maestro/pfieland/tests/nested

Breakpoint 1, main () at /home3/Languages/regression/gdb/pascal/source/nested.pascal:5
5       type     uns_tiny = packed 0..255;
(gdb) b inner
Function "inner" not defined.
(gdb) p int
No symbol "int" in current context.
(gdb) p sint
No symbol "sint" in current context.
(gdb) maintenance print symbols xxx
(gdb) c
Continuing.

Program exited with code 0200.
(gdb) q

Here is the output of the print symbols. Note that ALL of the symbols
for the enclosing procedure are missing from the symbol table:


Symtab for file /home3/Languages/regression/gdb/pascal/source/nested.pascal
Read from object file /home2/maestro/pfieland/tests/nested (168908)
Language: pascal

Line table:

 line 3 at 1a4c
 line 5 at 1ab0
 line 16 at 1ab8
 line 20 at 1ae0
 line 21 at 1ae8
 line 22 at 1af0
 line 23 at 1af8
 line 26 at 1b10
 line 27 at 1b18
 line 28 at 1b20
 line 29 at 1b28
 line 30 at 1b30
 line 31 at 1b38
 line 32 at 1b40
 line 33 at 1b4c

Blockvector:

block #000 (object 0x199698) [0x19b0..0x1b68]
 int main(); block (object 0x199608) starting at 0x1a50,
  block #001 (object 0x199628) [0x19b0..0x1b68] (under 0x199698)
   typedef output output; 
   typedef input input; 
   typedef text text; 
   typedef string  string ; 
   typedef shortint shortint; 
   typedef alpha alpha; 
   typedef alfa alfa; 
   typedef .bit .bit; 
   typedef boolean boolean; 
   typedef real real; 
   typedef string string; 
   typedef char char; 
   typedef integer 1 integer 1; 
   typedef uns short integer uns short integer; 
   typedef uns tiny integer uns tiny integer; 
   typedef tiny integer tiny integer; 
   typedef integer integer; 
   typedef integer  integer ; 
   typedef .pointer .pointer; 
    block #002 (object 0x199608) [0x1a50..0x1b68] (under 0x199628) main
      block #003 (object 0x1995d0) [0x1abc..0x1b10] (under 0x199608) inner
       int inner(); block (object 0x1995d0) starting at 0x1abc,
       integer ti; local at 0xffffffe4,
       typedef <subrange 0 .. 0> of integer  shortint; 
       <subrange 0 .. 0> of integer  inner_sint; local at 0xffffffe2,
       integer inner_int; local at 0xffffffdc,

Here is a fix:

*** /home/tools/gnu/gdb-4.6/gdb/dwarfread.c	Tue Jul 14 03:34:23 1992
--- dwarfread.c	Tue Sep  1 15:49:53 1992
***************
*** 1535,1542 ****
        objfile -> ei.main_func_lowpc = dip -> at_low_pc;
        objfile -> ei.main_func_highpc = dip -> at_high_pc;
      }
    new = push_context (0, dip -> at_low_pc);
!   new -> name = new_symbol (dip, objfile);
    list_in_scope = &local_symbols;
    process_dies (thisdie + dip -> die_length, enddie, objfile);
    new = pop_context ();
--- 2260,2272 ----
        objfile -> ei.main_func_lowpc = dip -> at_low_pc;
        objfile -> ei.main_func_highpc = dip -> at_high_pc;
      }
+   /* Peggy Fieland.  We want this name to appear in symbols of the
+      ENCLOSING SCOPE, so don't push the context until AFTER we've
+      added the name to the list of symbols.  */
+   sym = new_symbol (dip, objfile);
    new = push_context (0, dip -> at_low_pc);
!   new-> name = sym;
!
    list_in_scope = &local_symbols;
    process_dies (thisdie + dip -> die_length, enddie, objfile);
    new = pop_context ();
***************
*** 1543,1549 ****
    /* Make a block for the local symbols within.  */
    finish_block (new -> name, &local_symbols, new -> old_blocks,
  		new -> start_addr, dip -> at_high_pc, objfile);
!   list_in_scope = &file_symbols;
  }
  
  
--- 2273,2286 ----
    /* Make a block for the local symbols within.  */
    finish_block (new -> name, &local_symbols, new -> old_blocks,
  		new -> start_addr, dip -> at_high_pc, objfile);
!   /* account for case of inner procedures.  Peggy Fieland. */
!   if (context_stack_depth == 0)
!      list_in_scope = &file_symbols;
!   else
!      {
!         local_symbols = new->locals;
!         list_in_scope = &local_symbols;
!      }
  }
  
  
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9209021430.AA02702@citron.sw.stratus.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!citron.sw.stratus.com!pfieland

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!citron.sw.stratus.com!pfieland
From: pfieland@citron.sw.stratus.com (Peggy Fieland)
Subject: problem with inner procedures in gdb
Message-ID: <9209021430.AA02702@citron.sw.stratus.com>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 14:30:39 GMT
Approved: bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 146