Article View: gnu.gdb.bug
Article #617value allocation in inferior
From: Adam R de Boor
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 1988 00:40
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 1988 00:40
8 lines
789 bytes
789 bytes
why are all string values allocated in the inferior process? Especially for convenience variables? There are various things that would benefit by having any easy way to do this. For instance, arguments for user-defined commands could be placed in a convenience variable, or the most-recent breakpoint number. At the moment, user-defined commands aren't nearly as useful as they could easily be... a
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8811120040.AA10883@buddy.Berkeley.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!BUDDY.BERKELEY.EDU!deboorShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!BUDDY.BERKELEY.EDU!deboor From: deboor@BUDDY.BERKELEY.EDU (Adam R de Boor) Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug Subject: value allocation in inferior Message-ID: <8811120040.AA10883@buddy.Berkeley.EDU> Date: 12 Nov 88 00:40:19 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 8