Re: segmentation violation with large symbol tables

Article View: gnu.gdb.bug

Article #717

#717

From: Anton Rang
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1989 17:20

8 lines
1085 bytes

Is your stack limit set too low?  Maybe try 'limit stack 3m' or
something like that, if you're using the shell.  On the other hand,
should there be some "reasonable" maximum size for stack allocation?

+---------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+
| Anton Rang (grad student) | "VMS Forever!"         | "Do worry...be SAD!" |
| Michigan State University | rang@cpswh.cps.msu.edu |                      |
+---------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2211@cps3xx.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!cps3xx!rang

References: <8903151523.AA12651@labgre.HP.COM>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!cps3xx!rang
From: rang@cpsin3.cps.msu.edu (Anton Rang)
Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug
Subject: Re: segmentation violation with large symbol tables
Message-ID: <2211@cps3xx.UUCP>
Date: 15 Mar 89 17:20:04 GMT
References: <8903151523.AA12651@labgre.HP.COM>
Sender: usenet@cps3xx.UUCP
Reply-To: rang@cpswh.cps.msu.edu (Anton Rang)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Michigan State University, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: glenne%hplsla@HP-SDE.SDE.HP.COM's message of 15 Mar 89 15:23:02 GMT

Reply to Parent Message