gdb bugs just reported, hmmmm....

Article View: gnu.gdb.bug

Article #756

#756

From: randy
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 1989 21:48

12 lines
903 bytes

    I guess I'll say it "aloud", instead of in many individual letters
  to many individual people:

    I would recommend that people *not* compile gdb with gcc.  If you
  do, please see the notes about doing so in the Makefile.

    This is not due to a bug in gcc, simply due to the large number of
  sites at which the fixincludes script has not been properley run or
  has missed something.  Again, see the notes in the Makefile.

							-- Randy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8904142148.AA27960@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!WHEATIES.AI.MIT.EDU!randy

References: <8904142118.AA22003@dingus.sun.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!WHEATIES.AI.MIT.EDU!randy
From: randy@WHEATIES.AI.MIT.EDU
Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug
Subject: gdb bugs just reported, hmmmm....
Message-ID: <8904142148.AA27960@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 14 Apr 89 21:48:31 GMT
References: <8904142118.AA22003@dingus.sun.com>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Distribution: gnu
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message