Article View: gnu.gdb.bug
Article #831GDB 3.5 vs. HP9000 S330 HP-UX 6.5
From: James J Dempsey
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:32
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 1990 21:32
21 lines
1159 bytes
1159 bytes
I just compiled gdb 3.5 on an HP 9000 Series 330 running HP-UX 6.5 (we'll be running 7.0 soon). I used "config.gdb hp9k320" and compiled with HP's cc. It compiled just fine with no warnings but whenever I run it on a program, it says "<program> has no symbol-table; symbols discarded". I don't know anything about the differences between different HP hardware. Is there something inherently broken about the 330 so that gdb compiled with hp9k320 doesn't work properly w.r.t. symbol tables? If so, does anyone have diffs for gdb to run on the 330? We're all sick of using cdb here. In case it helps, the command "uname -a" returns this: HP-UX syseng7 6.5 A 9000/330 syseng7 Thanks, --Jim Dempsey-- jjd@bbn.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9002082131.AA10297@life.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!bu.edu!bu-cs!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ALEXANDER.BBN.COM!jjdShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!uunet!bu.edu!bu-cs!snorkelwacker!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ALEXANDER.BBN.COM!jjd From: jjd@ALEXANDER.BBN.COM (James J Dempsey) Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug Subject: GDB 3.5 vs. HP9000 S330 HP-UX 6.5 Message-ID: <9002082131.AA10297@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: 8 Feb 90 21:32:10 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 21