Re: gdb3.5 & malloc(3c)

Article View: gnu.gdb.bug

Article #876

#876

From: Piercarlo Grandi
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 1990 16:51

20 lines
1278 bytes

In article <31297@bigtex.cactus.org> james@bigtex.cactus.org (James Van Artsdalen) writes:
  
  [ ... about saving space (and also time) avoiding readline in gdb ... ]

  On my system, it hardly seems worth the effort:
  
  $ size *.o
  funmap.o: 400 + 1140 + 0 = 1540
  history.o: 6792 + 228 + 0 = 7020
  keymaps.o: 532 + 3108 + 0 = 3640
  readline.o: 19920 + 1020 + 0 = 20940

Well, this used to be the text size of the Unix kernel on a PDP-11... :-(.
Or, even worse, I know full screen, Emacs like editors that are smaller.

I am still a stupid minimalist.
-- 
Piercarlo "Peter" Grandi           | ARPA: pcg%cs.aber.ac.uk@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk
Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth        | UUCP: ...!mcvax!ukc!aber-cs!pcg
Penglais, Aberystwyth SY23 3BZ, UK | INET: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1670@aber-cs.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!dcl-cs!aber-cs!pcg

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!dcl-cs!aber-cs!pcg
From: pcg@aber-cs.UUCP (Piercarlo Grandi)
Newsgroups: gnu.gdb.bug
Subject: Re: gdb3.5 & malloc(3c)
Summary: 40K are hardly worth the effort... :-(.
Message-ID: <1670@aber-cs.UUCP>
Date: 1 Mar 90 16:51:22 GMT
Reply-To: pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi)
Distribution: gnu
Organization: Dept of CS, UCW Aberystwyth
 (Disclaimer: my statements are purely personal)
Lines: 20