Thread View: gnu.gdb.bug
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by taylor
Sat, 10 Jun 1989 22:27
further fixes for GDB's ns32k disassembler
Author: taylor
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1989 22:27
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1989 22:27
220 lines
6600 bytes
6600 bytes
[I sent this last night, but it doesn't appear to have been received.]
Here are some changes for GDB's disassembler for the ns32k.
The changes cause GDB
. to print the names of the cpu registers for the lpr and spr
instructions
. to print the names of the mmu registers for the lmr and smr
instructions
. to properly print the 3rd and 4th arguments to the exts and inss
instructions
These changes bring it more in line with what GAS configured for the
ns32k will accept as input, but there are still some discrepancies.
RCS file: RCS/ns32k-opcode.h,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -c1 -r1.3 ns32k-opcode.h
*** /tmp/,RCSt1022486 Sat Jun 10 00:34:29 1989
--- ns32k-opcode.h Sat Jun 10 00:33:36 1989
***************
*** 49,51 ****
* p : displacement - pc relative addressing
! */
static struct not
--- 49,60 ----
* p : displacement - pc relative addressing
! * O : setcfg instruction options list
! * C : cinv instruction options list
! * S : string instruction options list
! * U : save/enter register list
! * u : restore/exit register list
! * M : mmu register
! * P : cpu register
! * g : 3rd operand of inss or exts instruction
! * G : 4th operand of inss or exts instruction
! */
static struct not
***************
*** 157,161 ****
{ "extd", 11,24, 0x32e, "2A3D1r4d" },
! { "extsb", 14,24, 0x0cce, "1A2B3i" },
! { "extsw", 14,24, 0x0dce, "1A2W3i" },
! { "extsd", 14,24, 0x0fce, "1A2D3i" },
{ "ffsb", 14,24, 0x046e, "1B2B" },
--- 166,170 ----
{ "extd", 11,24, 0x32e, "2A3D1r4d" },
! { "extsb", 14,24, 0x0cce, "1A2B4G3g" },
! { "extsw", 14,24, 0x0dce, "1A2W4G3g" },
! { "extsd", 14,24, 0x0fce, "1A2D4G3g" },
{ "ffsb", 14,24, 0x046e, "1B2B" },
***************
*** 179,183 ****
{ "insd", 11,24, 0x3ae, "2D3D1r4d" },
! { "inssb", 14,24, 0x08ce, "1B2A3i" },
! { "inssw", 14,24, 0x09ce, "1W2A3i" },
! { "inssd", 14,24, 0x0bce, "1D2A3i" },
{ "jsr", 11,16, 0x67f, "1A" },
--- 188,192 ----
{ "insd", 11,24, 0x3ae, "2D3D1r4d" },
! { "inssb", 14,24, 0x08ce, "1B2A4G3g" },
! { "inssw", 14,24, 0x09ce, "1W2A4G3g" },
! { "inssd", 14,24, 0x0bce, "1D2A4G3g" },
{ "jsr", 11,16, 0x67f, "1A" },
***************
*** 185,190 ****
{ "lfsr", 19,24, 0x00f3e,"1D" },
! { "lmr", 15,24, 0x0b1e, "2D1q" },
! { "lprb", 7,16, 0x6c, "2B1q" },
! { "lprw", 7,16, 0x6d, "2W1q" },
! { "lprd", 7,16, 0x6f, "2D1q" },
{ "lshb", 14,24, 0x144e, "1B2B" },
--- 194,199 ----
{ "lfsr", 19,24, 0x00f3e,"1D" },
! { "lmr", 15,24, 0x0b1e, "2D1M" },
! { "lprb", 7,16, 0x6c, "2B1P" },
! { "lprw", 7,16, 0x6d, "2W1P" },
! { "lprd", 7,16, 0x6f, "2D1P" },
{ "lshb", 14,24, 0x144e, "1B2B" },
***************
*** 332,337 ****
{ "skpst", 16,16, 0x8c0e, "1S" },
! { "smr", 15,24, 0x0f1e, "2D1q" },
! { "sprb", 7,16, 0x2c, "2B1q" },
! { "sprw", 7,16, 0x2d, "2W1q" },
! { "sprd", 7,16, 0x2f, "2D1q" },
{ "subf", 14,24, 0x11be, "1F2F" },
--- 341,346 ----
{ "skpst", 16,16, 0x8c0e, "1S" },
! { "smr", 15,24, 0x0f1e, "2D1M" },
! { "sprb", 7,16, 0x2c, "2B1P" },
! { "sprw", 7,16, 0x2d, "2W1P" },
! { "sprd", 7,16, 0x2f, "2D1P" },
{ "subf", 14,24, 0x11be, "1F2F" },
===================================================================
RCS file: RCS/ns32k-pinsn.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -c1 -r1.2 ns32k-pinsn.c
*** /tmp/,RCSt1022486 Sat Jun 10 00:34:30 1989
--- ns32k-pinsn.c Fri Jun 9 22:59:20 1989
***************
*** 95,96 ****
--- 95,165 ----
+ #if !defined(NS32032) && !defined(NS32532)
+ #define NS32032
+ #endif
+
+ #if defined(NS32532)
+ struct option cpureg[]= /* lpr spr */
+ {
+ { "us", 0x0, 0xf },
+ { "dcr", 0x1, 0xf },
+ { "bpc", 0x2, 0xf },
+ { "dsr", 0x3, 0xf },
+ { "car", 0x4, 0xf },
+ { "fp", 0x8, 0xf },
+ { "sp", 0x9, 0xf },
+ { "sb", 0xa, 0xf },
+ { "usp", 0xb, 0xf },
+ { "cfg", 0xc, 0xf },
+ { "psr", 0xd, 0xf },
+ { "intbase", 0xe, 0xf },
+ { "mod", 0xf, 0xf },
+ { 0 , 0x00, 0xf }
+ };
+ #endif
+
+ #if defined(NS32532) || defined(NS32382)
+ struct option mmureg[]= /* lmr smr */
+ {
+ { "mcr", 0x9, 0xf },
+ { "msr", 0xa, 0xf },
+ { "tear", 0xb, 0xf },
+ { "ptb0", 0xc, 0xf },
+ { "ptb1", 0xd, 0xf },
+ { "ivar0", 0xe, 0xf },
+ { "ivar1", 0xf, 0xf },
+ { 0 , 0x0, 0xf }
+ };
+ #endif
+
+ #if defined(NS32032)
+ struct option cpureg[]= /* lpr spr */
+ {
+ { "upsr", 0x0, 0xf },
+ { "fp", 0x8, 0xf },
+ { "sp", 0x9, 0xf },
+ { "sb", 0xa, 0xf },
+ { "psr", 0xb, 0xf },
+ { "intbase", 0xe, 0xf },
+ { "mod", 0xf, 0xf },
+ { 0 , 0x0, 0xf }
+ };
+ #endif
+
+ #if !defined(NS32532) && !defined(NS32382)
+ struct option mmureg[]= /* lmr smr */
+ {
+ { "bpr0", 0x0, 0xf },
+ { "bpr1", 0x1, 0xf },
+ { "pf0", 0x4, 0xf },
+ { "pf1", 0x5, 0xf },
+ { "sc", 0x8, 0xf },
+ { "msr", 0xa, 0xf },
+ { "bcnt", 0xb, 0xf },
+ { "ptb0", 0xc, 0xf },
+ { "ptb1", 0xd, 0xf },
+ { "eia", 0xf, 0xf },
+ { 0 , 0x0, 0xf }
+ };
+ #endif
+
/*
***************
*** 125,126 ****
--- 194,208 ----
+ list_search(reg_value, optionP, result)
+ int reg_value;
+ struct option *optionP;
+ char *result;
+ {
+ for (; optionP->pattern; optionP++) {
+ if ((reg_value & optionP->match) == optionP->value) {
+ sprintf(result, "%s", optionP->pattern);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ sprintf(result, "undefined");
+ }
***************
*** 482,483 ****
--- 564,585 ----
*aoffsetp += 8;
+ break;
+ case 'M':
+ Ivalue = bit_extract(buffer, ioffset-4, 4);
+ list_search(Ivalue, mmureg, result);
+ ioffset -= 4;
+ break;
+ case 'P':
+ Ivalue = bit_extract(buffer, ioffset-4, 4);
+ list_search(Ivalue, cpureg, result);
+ ioffset -= 4;
+ break;
+ case 'g':
+ Ivalue = bit_extract(buffer, *aoffsetp, 3);
+ sprintf(result, "%d", Ivalue);
+ *aoffsetp += 3;
+ break;
+ case 'G':
+ Ivalue = bit_extract(buffer, *aoffsetp, 5);
+ sprintf(result, "%d", Ivalue + 1);
+ *aoffsetp += 5;
break;
further fixes for GDB's ns32k disassembler
Author: Ove Ewerlid
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1989 23:07
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 1989 23:07
13 lines
1053 bytes
1053 bytes
I've got the gdb-description of m88k from MCC and they seems to have done quite some work. I can't fully realize what they have done from just the m88k-opcode.h but it looks as if they have included timings of the instructions in the table. I get the impression that they have done a m88k emulator. I will stay low with my dissassembler stuff in GAS until I know what they have done. I have also been forced to make things less reverse enginerable in order to gain speed. I hope to be able to supply you with the new ns32k version of GAS soon. Still one can't tell how long it takes. Ove
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads