Changes to Utopia, Courier Type 1 font programs (2.4.1 to 2.5)?

Article View: gnu.ghostscript.bug

Article #335

Back to gnu.ghostscript.bug Previous Next

#335

From: John T Kohl
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1992 16:48

12 lines
1019 bytes

I noticed that the Courier and Utopia Type 1 fonts provided with GS 2.5
have been (at least) reformatted from those provided with GS 2.4.1.
The 2.4.1 versions had some pseudo-structured comments at the top, and
used eexec; the 2.5 versions don't have the structured comments, and
don't use eexec.

Any particular reason for the change?
--
John Kohl <jtkohl@cs.berkeley.edu>
UC Berkeley CS grad student
Member of the League for Programming Freedom--details: league@prep.ai.mit.edu
(The above opinions are MINE.  Don't put my words in somebody else's mouth!)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <182r85INN4hk@agate.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.berkeley.edu!jtkohl

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.ghostscript.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.berkeley.edu!jtkohl
From: jtkohl@cs.berkeley.edu (John T Kohl)
Subject: Changes to Utopia, Courier Type 1 font programs (2.4.1 to 2.5)?
Message-ID: <182r85INN4hk@agate.berkeley.edu>
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 16:48:05 GMT
Approved: bug-ghostscript@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 13