Article View: gnu.ghostscript.bug
Article #613Does it work?
From: Robert D. Seals
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1988 12:31
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1988 12:31
24 lines
1429 bytes
1429 bytes
Subject: ghostscript Hi there, This 'ghostscript' thang looks like a really great idea. I have loaded it onto my machine, a "PC". I think of myself as a reasonably decent C hack, with lots o' Unix experience. I have not been able to get that thing to compile. I have Turbo C v.1.5, just as the authors'. The makefile is probably a major contributor to the problem. It is a mess, and it appears to try to cater to both Unix and Borland 'make'. May I suggest that someday someone make 2 different makefiles? This would be a really useful tool for me, since we have no Suns here, because I do a fair amount of PS coding that is painful without a previewer. Unfortunately, it is thusfar unusable. Thanks, rob PS. I first sent this to 'gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu' and it was returned to me to send it to ghostscript-bug. What is the scoop over there? Is there a list of places to address certain comments to? For gcc, g++, gdb, etc? Is there any news group that addresses these issues? I have not seen anything resembling 'gnu' in my newsrc...
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8811151231.AA15669@asrcmv.albany.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ASRCMV.ALBANY.EDU!robShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ASRCMV.ALBANY.EDU!rob From: rob@ASRCMV.ALBANY.EDU (Robert D. Seals) Newsgroups: gnu.ghostscript.bug Subject: Does it work? Message-ID: <8811151231.AA15669@asrcmv.albany.edu> Date: 15 Nov 88 12:31:04 GMT Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu Distribution: gnu Organization: GNUs Not Usenet Lines: 24