🚀 go-pugleaf

Anders Thulin writes:
> I think I've found a couple of bugs in Ghostscript 1.2.

Am I mistaken is asserting that GhostScript is actually rife with
bugs, both major and minor, and that bugs should be reported only
with fixes?  Or should I start making a (huge) list?

Of course, I love GhostScript and appreciate the code very, very
much, but there is still a rather large amount of work to be
done---I envision it becoming competitive with real Adobe PostScript
in the not-to-distant future . . . with as many people working on
it as there are, I wouldn't be surprised to see this happen,
especially given the fine coordination provided so far by the
author.

This baby will take off with a bit more work!

-tom