Results of running timing.ps on several machines

Article View: gnu.ghostscript.bug

Article #76

Back to gnu.ghostscript.bug Previous Next

#76

From: geoff
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1992 19:35

32 lines
1591 bytes

This is not a bug report, but I thought it might be interesting
to see how ghostscript 2.4 performs are various machines.  The DOS  
machines here are using ghostscript compiled with TurboC++ 1.01.
The NeXT uses gcc as a compiler.

					286+287		486	Next 68040
					12 Mhz		33 Mhz	25 Mhz

forall, 100000 string elements		9390		1380	1031
for, 60000 integers			6150		820	748
read 100000 1-char names		20430		3020	2283
read 100000 1-digit numbers		18070		2580	2284
read 20000 10-char names		10110		2300	1146
read 20000 6-digit numbers		8520		1050	790
display 30000 10-point characters
 at 300 dpi				24990		3960	1593
display 30000 10-point characters
 (from a file) at 300 dpi		26310		4290	1594

Anyone care to post how well other machines do?

P.S. Does anyone know from where I can ftp a Postscript benchmarking
program? (e.g. PPST)


--
*******************************************************
	Geoff Ghose				
	School of Optometry	360 Minor Hall		
	Univ. of California	Berkeley, CA 94720
	(510) 642-6440		Fax: (510) 642-3323
	NeXT Mail: geoff@pinoko.berkeley.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <rvht7INNlot@agate.berkeley.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pinoko.berkeley.edu!geoff

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.ghostscript.bug
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pinoko.berkeley.edu!geoff
From: geoff@pinoko.berkeley.edu
Subject: Results of running timing.ps on several machines
Message-ID: <rvht7INNlot@agate.berkeley.edu>
Keywords: Postscript,benchmarks
Sender: gnulists@ai.mit.edu
Reply-To: geoff@pinoko.berkeley.edu
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Distribution: gnu
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1992 19:35:03 GMT
Approved: bug-ghostscript@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 33