Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1038Re: "official" FSF position on apple
From: Anthony J Stieber
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 22:46
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 22:46
46 lines
2592 bytes
2592 bytes
In article <1992Sep27.173842.17544@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> sjg@dogmatix.ph.kcl.ac.uk (Simon Gornall) writes: >In article <w4TLRB19w165w@mantis.co.uk>, mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew) writes: >|> sfuller@tamsun.tamu.edu (Steven Eric Fuller) writes: >|> > In article <1992Sep18.222551.28385@uwm.edu> anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Anthony >|> > >There is of course, no such thing as a Macintosh compatible. >|> > Yes there is. Another Macintosh. >|> >|> Which is more than you can say for PCs... >|> >|> Anyway, there is such a thing as a Macintosh-compatible non-Apple computer. >|> The Outbound laptop is one, and the new Radius plug-in multiprocessing board >|> is another. >|> >|> >|> mathew > >Yup - and also those Atari-ST users who run Spectre GCR. They're probably the largest group >of Mac cloners. I've known about some of these systems before, but I never hear about them much, they didn't seem to be usable systems. So far people have mentioned some Macintosh emulation packages for other computers, or outright Mactintosh compatible machines. These are what I know of so far: Macintosh Compatible Computer List Name Host computer Mechanism Limitations? Price? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Outbound Outbound laptop Apple ROMs Spectre GCR Atari ST Apple ROMs Amax?? Amiga Apple ROMs Liken Sun Sparc emulation no license ?????? NeXT Hydra ISA card Apple ROMs Cork Cork desktop Apple ROMs Please post or mail additions or corrections. Can any of these machines be considered as viable alternatives to actually buying a Macintosh? If one already owns one of the above computers, the emulation package might be cheaper than buying another computer. Could someone buy one of the above systems and hope to use it as a Macintosh only? Can the above systems do everything that Apple Macintosh machines can? Also, which companies have been threatened or sued by Apple? -- <-:(= Anthony Stieber anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu uwm!uwmcsd4!anthony
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1a5dkkINNj1h@uwm.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!anthonyReferences:
<1992Sep23.104359.16270@tamsun.tamu.edu> <w4TLRB19w165w@mantis.co.uk> <1992Sep27.173842.17544@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!anthony From: anthony@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Anthony J Stieber) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: "official" FSF position on apple Date: 27 Sep 1992 22:46:44 GMT Organization: Computing Services Division, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 46 Message-ID: <1a5dkkINNj1h@uwm.edu> References: <1992Sep23.104359.16270@tamsun.tamu.edu> <w4TLRB19w165w@mantis.co.uk> <1992Sep27.173842.17544@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4