Re: Making Mach build with non-CMU tools (suggestions)

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #1047

#1047

From: Gautam H. Thaker
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1992 20:57

21 lines
1539 bytes

In article <STEINARB.92Oct4172851@hagtorn.idt.unit.no> steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang) writes:

[article raises many excellent points about difficulties of working with
 CMU makes, etc. It suggested alternatives, but raised the following question.]

   The question: is who is going to do it? CMU don't have any incentives
   for the time being. OSF? FSF? I don't know.

   - Steinar

Can someone from the CMU mach project please post their plans for MACH work
over the next year or so? In which areas will we see significant
activities?  Is the MKnn count for releases likely to continue in to
foreseeable future?  Will the center of activities ever shift to OSF? FSF?
If it is OSF than the new licensing issues will severly hamper access by
the research community.

Gautam H. Thaker (gthaker@atl.ge.com) 609-866-6412 (fax x6397. Dialcom 8-777)
GE Adv. Tech. Lab., MS 145-2; Route 38; Moorestown, NJ 08057.  767-4396 (home)
--
Gautam H. Thaker

Technical Details

Message-ID: <GTHAKER.92Oct7165748@trantor.atl.ge.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!crdgw1!ge-dab!puma.ATL.GE.COM!puma!gthaker

References: <STEINARB.92Oct4172851@hagtorn.idt.unit.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!crdgw1!ge-dab!puma.ATL.GE.COM!puma!gthaker
From: gthaker@fergie.dnet.ge.com (Gautam H. Thaker)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Making Mach build with non-CMU tools (suggestions)
Message-ID: <GTHAKER.92Oct7165748@trantor.atl.ge.com>
Date: 7 Oct 92 20:57:48 GMT
References: <STEINARB.92Oct4172851@hagtorn.idt.unit.no>
Sender: news@puma.ATL.GE.COM (USENET News System)
Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Organization: GE Advanced Technology Laboratories
Lines: 21
In-Reply-To: steinarb@idt.unit.no's message of 4 Oct 92 21:28:51 GMT

Reply to Parent Message