Re: Making Mach build with non-CMU tools (suggestions)

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #1073

#1073

From: gip2 course
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 09:55

17 lines
1345 bytes

In <STEINARB.92Oct5142041@gjerd.idt.unit.no> steinarb@idt.unit.no (Steinar Bang) writes:

>Neither can I, really. So maybe the best solutions for all parties
>would be to make GNU Make support the CMU enhancements.

>*Even* though this might mean cluttering GNU Make with facilities
>needed to compile a single program (ie. the Mach 3.0 microkernel).

Well, those facilities could be surrounded with #ifdef's which are not defined
by default. But I agree that we need a CMU compatible make tool. Changing the
Makefiles whenever a new kernel is released is a pain in the *ss.

>I would be curious to know the opinions of Roland McGrath (GNU Make
>maintainer) and Michael I. Bushnell (GNU Hurd developer) on this
>subject. 

Me too.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BvyBKz.83n@sci.kun.nl>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sun4nl!wn1.sci.kun.nl!sci.kun.nl!gip200

References: <STEINARB.92Oct4172851@hagtorn.idt.unit.no> <1992Oct5.113104.26642@osf.org> <STEINARB.92Oct5142041@gjerd.idt.unit.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sun4nl!wn1.sci.kun.nl!sci.kun.nl!gip200
From: gip200@sci.kun.nl (gip2 course)
Subject: Re: Making Mach build with non-CMU tools (suggestions)
Message-ID: <BvyBKz.83n@sci.kun.nl>
Sender: news@sci.kun.nl (NUnet News Owner)
Reply-To: peter@global.hacktic.nl
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
References: <STEINARB.92Oct4172851@hagtorn.idt.unit.no> <1992Oct5.113104.26642@osf.org> <STEINARB.92Oct5142041@gjerd.idt.unit.no>
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1992 09:55:47 GMT
Lines: 18

Reply to Parent Message