Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1251Re: hayes lawsuit
From: Peter da Silva
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 14:34
Date: Mon, 20 May 1991 14:34
15 lines
1414 bytes
1414 bytes
In article <14833@ulysses.att.com> smb@ulysses.att.com (Steven Bellovin) writes: > The fundamental question we have to answer is this: if software > patents are to be disallowed, what alternative mechanism would you > propose to encourage people to publish new algorithms? Since one cannot sell software without effectively publishing the algorithms used, particularly for interface specifications which seems to be where the majority of these patents occur (XOR cursor, guard times, offscreen bitmaps, setuid, etc), I think this is pretty much a moot point. Can you come up with a counterexample: a new algorithm that was not published in any form prior to the appearance of software patents? -- Peter da Silva; Ferranti International Controls Corporation; +1 713 274 5180; Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012; `-_-' "Have you hugged your wolf, today?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4VFB=I@xds13.ferranti.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!ficc!peterReferences:
<TMB.91May13041549@volterra.ai.mit.edu> <TMB.91May19100536@volterra.ai.mit.edu> <14833@ulysses.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.misc,comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: hayes lawsuit Message-ID: <4VFB=I@xds13.ferranti.com> Date: 20 May 91 14:34:19 GMT References: <TMB.91May13041549@volterra.ai.mit.edu> <TMB.91May19100536@volterra.ai.mit.edu> <14833@ulysses.att.com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Distribution: usa Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 15