Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1280Re: hayes lawsuit
From: Kurt Sletterdahl
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 17:45
Date: Tue, 28 May 1991 17:45
28 lines
1664 bytes
1664 bytes
It has been said that what Hayes patented was not new or novel, so I
thought I would post how novelty is currently defined, from the
government booklet "General Information Concerning Patents":
In order for an invention to be patentable it must be new as
defined in the patent law, which provides that an invention cannot
be patented if--
"(a) The invention was known or used by others in this country, or
patented or described in a printed publication in this or a
foreign country, before the invention therof by the applicant for
patent or,"
"(b) The invention was patented or described in a printed
publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on
sale in this country more than one year prior to the application
for patent in the United States....."
***
The subject matter sought to be patented must be sufficiently
different from what has been used or described before that it
may be said to be unobvious to a person having ordinary skill
in the area of technology related to the invention.
UUCP: {amdahl!bungia, uunet!rosevax, crash}!orbit!pnet51!kurt
ARPA: crash!orbit!pnet51!kurt@nosc.mil
INET: kurt@pnet51.orb.mn.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5013@orbit.cts.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!sialis!orbit!pnet51!kurtShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!sialis!orbit!pnet51!kurt From: kurt@pnet51.orb.mn.org (Kurt Sletterdahl) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.misc,comp.dcom.modems,misc.legal Subject: Re: hayes lawsuit Message-ID: <5013@orbit.cts.com> Date: 28 May 91 17:45:01 GMT Sender: news@orbit.cts.com Organization: People-Net [pnet51], Minneapolis, MN. Lines: 28