🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1991May21.090027@riddler.Berkeley.EDU> yow@riddler.Berkeley.EDU (Billy Yow 283-4051) writes:
 [On proposed 5 cent royalties for trivial patents]
>A shareware or public domain program (that infringed) COULD NOT BE
>COPIED because the making of a copy would then require a patent payment
>if the copy was given away.  

>And what about BACKUPs of patented software do they infringe?

What *exactly* constitutes patent infringement?  Is it the
construction of a machine which falls under the patent?  Or is it the
subsequent sale or other disposal of that machine?  I think it is the
former (Note: I am not a lawyer).  Hence every time one loads (say)
RSA software into one's machine one breaks the law.  Making a backup
does not affect the issue since it is the loading of the software
(converting a general purpose computer into a specific machine which
is covered by the patent) that matters.

Paul.
-- 
Paul Johnson |            Isn't modern education wonderful: one size fits all!
-------------^------------------v-------------------------v-------------------
GEC-Marconi Research is not 	| Telex: 995016 GECRES G  | Tel: +44 245 73331
responsible for my opinions.	| Inet: paj@gec-mrc.co.uk | Fax: +44 245 75244