Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1547Re: Fund raising at the FSF
From: Kevin Broadey
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:25
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 16:25
55 lines
2860 bytes
2860 bytes
>>>>> In article <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu>, >>>>> zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes: >ME: >>I believe the CopyLeft places no restrictions on "paraphrasing" -- so >>feel free to go ahead to your heart's content. MZ: > Correct. What about quotation? Quotation or plagiarism - what's the difference? One is a fair use of a copyrighted work, the other isn't. Your contention that GNU software is not "free", in that it is not *totally* without obligation or restriction, is true. But before you claim victory... You object to the use of the word "free" in "Free Software Foundation" because the "freedom" is restricted by a caveat in the form of the General Public Licence. Many contributors have already pointed out that "free" is always restricted by the context in which it is used, so you can't use a linguistic argument. Now that I've flogged that one to death (again), I'll move on to what I think your real objection is:- You object to the terms of the GPL because they require you apply the GPL to any of your own work which you distribute with FSF work, and you want your work to remain proprietary. The answer to this is - don't distribute your work with FSF work. Instead, distribute it on its own with all your lock-out, software- hoarding conditions and include a README file listing the FSF stuff needed to get it up and running. This way you don't contravene the GPL because you're not redistributing FSF software. There is an alternative interpretation to your objection to the GPL, based on your anarchic (no insult intended) view of "free"... You object to the terms of the GPL because they do not allow you to plagiarise swathes of FSF code, bundle them into your own work, then distribute the lot with every copyright, "look-and-feel" and "trade secret" protection that you can find. I think this interpretation is morally reprehensible and against the best interests of the user community the "free" software is aimed at. Kevin -- .signature: no such file or directory
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<KEVIN.93Jan5162507@calamityjane.edscom.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!edscom!kevinReferences:
<C0B34q.Ax0@news.udel.edu> <1993Jan3.213759.18973@husc3.harvard.edu> <C0CCt3.CG5@cs.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,talk.philosophy.misc,alt.usage.english Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!edscom!kevin From: kevin@edscom.demon.co.uk (Kevin Broadey) Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF In-Reply-To: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu's message of 5 Jan 93 02:29:55 EST Message-ID: <KEVIN.93Jan5162507@calamityjane.edscom.demon.co.uk> X-Attributions-By: Supercite 2.2 X-Disclaimer: These opinions are mine: others available on request. Lines: 55 Sender: kevin@edscom.demon.co.uk (Kevin Broadey) Organization: EDS-Scicon, Milton Keynes, UK X-Newsreader: GNUS 3.14.1 References: <C0B34q.Ax0@news.udel.edu> <1993Jan3.213759.18973@husc3.harvard.edu> <C0CCt3.CG5@cs.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 16:25:10 GMT