Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1563Re: Public Domain C Compiler?
From: Michael R Castle
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 16:12
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 16:12
46 lines
3056 bytes
3056 bytes
In article <C0FuFu.o41@austin.ibm.com> moller@austin.ibm.com (Christian
H. L. Moller) writes:
>In article <2B4A0FD5.FD6B@tct.com>, chip@tct.com (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>> From discussion on this newsgroup, I'm given to understand that
>> someone is working on a truly free (public domain or equivalent)
>> C compiler. Is this impression correct? If so, who's doing it?
>
>It's called `gcc', by the good folks at the Free Software Foundation. You
>can get it, and tons of other stuff, by ftp from a lot of places
>(ftp.uu.net:/systems/gnu and prep.ai.mit.edu:/pub/gnu to name a couple, do
>a `dir gcc*', also take a look in ./GNUinfo). There are also a few `gnu'
>newsgroups (e.g. gnu.announce, gnu.gcc.announce) that can give you more
>information.
No, Christian, you miss the point. I think Chip knows very much all about
gcc and the FSF. GCC is NOT public domain. It is till copyrighted, by
the FSF.
What Chip want's to know about is a _truly_ pd compiler. I've seen a few
posts here (well, 2 actually I can remember, but I dont' read everything
posted to this group), I have doubts to their dedication to the project.
Writing a compiler is a daunting project (ask the FSF!). Writing a portable
compiler, even more so. While someone may write a complete compiler for
one machine, and release it into the public domain, with a statement like
"Feel free to use this, and port to other machines!", it becomes quite a
logistic problem to try to incorporate changes into the original compiler
in a coherent manner. And I feel it's really more than one person could
handle.
When I see posts like "my friend is working on a pd compiler," I tend to have
doubts. If I see something like "for our graduate project, we are trying to
implement a portable compiler accross multiple machine, and it will be
released into the public domain," then I'll tend to give it a little more
credence (after all, the slavedr^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hadvisor will probably just provide
incentive and some coordination). It's not that I would doubt the sincerity
of an individual to attempt such a project, I just really doubt one person
could do it and remain sane (hmm.... rms....?? nahhhh :-)
just some random ramblings,
mrc
--
Mike Castle .-=NEXUS=-. Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
mcastle@cs.umr.edu and be right all the time, or not work at all
S087891@UMRVMA.UMR.EDU and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan6.161245.4926@umr.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!usenet-feed.cc.umr.edu!mcastleReferences:
<2B4A0FD5.FD6B@tct.com> <C0FuFu.o41@austin.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!usenet-feed.cc.umr.edu!mcastle From: mcastle@cs.umr.edu (Michael R Castle) Subject: Re: Public Domain C Compiler? References: <2B4A0FD5.FD6B@tct.com> <C0FuFu.o41@austin.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 16:12:45 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: next9.cs.umr.edu Organization: University of Missouri - Rolla, Rolla, MO Sender: cnews@umr.edu (UMR Usenet News Post) Message-ID: <1993Jan6.161245.4926@umr.edu> Lines: 46