Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1633Re: Fund raising at the FSF
From: Scott Ballantyne
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 18:03
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1993 18:03
23 lines
1493 bytes
1493 bytes
In article <1993Jan7.123025.19069@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes: You haven't read the GPL. The FSF legally owns all code licensed under the GPL, under *any* reasonable definition of intellectual property. If the FSF owns all code licensed under the GPL, then why can't they legally prevent people from running GNU products on their Apple computers? FSF can't legally violate the terms of the GPL anymore than you or I can, which is why you see many messages from rms asking people not to help get GNU stuff up on Apple computers, but not one message from a FSF lawyer threatening a suit if anyone runs emacs on a mac. If all I can legally do is ask you to please not use my software, and please no one show you how to use my software, that doesn't seem like a reasonable definition of ownership. Really, the FSF is more of a caretaker than an owner of GPL covered software. sdb --- sdb@ssr.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0JrIH.BEK@ssr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!hotmomma!sdbReferences:
<1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu> <726334555snx@crynwr.com> <1993Jan7.123025.19069@husc3.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,talk.philosophy.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!hotmomma!sdb From: sdb@ssr.com (Scott Ballantyne) Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF In-Reply-To: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu's message of 07 Jan 93 12:30:22 EST Message-ID: <C0JrIH.BEK@ssr.com> Lines: 28 Sender: sdb@ssr.com (Scott Ballantyne) Organization: ScotSoft Research References: <1993Jan5.022956.19008@husc3.harvard.edu> <726334555snx@crynwr.com> <1993Jan7.123025.19069@husc3.harvard.edu> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 18:03:51 GMT