Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #1674Re: Copyleft vs Public Domain
From: Joe Sharkey
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 21:15
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1993 21:15
49 lines
2540 bytes
2540 bytes
In article <9301090813.AA20380@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman) writes:
>freedom to redistribute and change it. That is not just speculation;
>the examples of X Windows, TeX,
The main difference I can see is that both Knuth (TeX) and Tanenbaum (Minix)
put their reputations on the line...
``Minix is written by Andy Tanenbaum of Vrigte(?) Universiry...''
Project GNU doesn't -- but the licence *still* seeks to protect your
reputation!
>The GPL also encourages companies which make improved versions to
>return their improvements for inclusion in the standard version. If
>not for this, GCC and Emacs would not be nearly as good as they are.
I built EMACS in 1987 - didn't like it, haven't used it since.
GCC: Several companies (Intel and OSF spring to mind) have provided "ports"
over the years. How many provided new algorithms/optimisations?
>That is not the philosophy of the GNU project, however. We are not
>pacifists, and being passive and never saying "No" to anyone is not
>our goal. Our aim is positive--to give the users the freedom to
>cooperate, which is distinguished from the freedom to obstruct. That
>has been the goal ever since the beginning.
You want to change the way I work/get employment.
F**king great! *You* do it from a "friendly" University -- over
here, we don't have any. Maybe we need sofdtware tarrifs against
zealots...
>If we put our software in the public domain, then we would have a
>great excuse to make. We could say, "Don't blame us if you have no
>freedom to share and change this program--it was that other guy who
>redistributed it with a nondisclosure license and no source." But we
>want to succeed in giving users that freedom, not prepare excuses for
>failure. We use the GPL because it succeeds.
You still deny any responsibily for "fitness of purpose". What's the
difference?
joe.
--
Joe Sharkey joe@jshark.inet-uk.co.uk ...!uunet!ibmpcug!jshark!joe
150 Hatfield Rd, St Albans, Herts AL1 4JA, UK Got a real domain name
(+44) 727 838662 Mail/News Feeds (v32/v32bis): info@inet-uk.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C0Lv27.K3q@jshark.inet-uk.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!jshark!joeReferences:
<9301090813.AA20380@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!jshark!joe From: joe@jshark.inet-uk.co.uk (Joe Sharkey) Subject: Re: Copyleft vs Public Domain Organization: Independent Network (UK) Distribution: gnu Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 21:15:42 GMT Message-ID: <C0Lv27.K3q@jshark.inet-uk.co.uk> References: <9301090813.AA20380@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Lines: 49