🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4hfecl$33t@solutions.solon.com> seebs@solutions.solon.com
(Peter Seebach) writes:

|> In article <4hf9m1$fp8@fg70.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>,
|> Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
|> >In comp.std.c, seebs@solutions.solon.com (Peter Seebach) wrote:

|> >>It is, in no place, unreasonable to assume that C means "ANSI C".

|> >I usually prefer "ISO C", but that's a very minor point, I think :-)

|> Yes, especially since ANSI adopted ISO's standard.  They are expected
|> to be identical, except for the occasional lag between meetings of one
|> and meetings of the other.

I don't think that that was Thomas' point.  If you look at our email
domains, you will realize that with regards to standardization, ANSI
has about the same weight as K&R for us:-).  An ANSI standard is a
standard in the United States, but not, or at least not de jura,
elsewhere.  (In practice, of course, in the absense of a competing ISO
standard, ANSI standards tend to become de facto standards even here.)
-- 
James Kanze         Tel.: (+33) 88 14 49 00        email: kanze@gabi-soft.fr
GABI Software, Sarl., 8 rue des Francs-Bourgeois, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
Conseils, études et réalisations en logiciel orienté objet --
                -- A la recherche d'une activité dans une region francophone