🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #2328

Which version of gcc is "best"(2.5.7)?

#2328
From: Charles Wilson
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 1994 00:45
19 lines
1248 bytes
I'm interested in some opinions on which version of gcc
is best.  I'm primarily interested in reliability (as I
will be supporting the compiler for several engineers),
but please accept my invitation to convince me that there
are other reasons that you believe a particular version
of gcc is "best".

My current benchmark is 2.2.2.  If you think another
version (like the latest 2.5.7) is better, let me know.
I'm primarily interested in cross-compiling.  No particular
processor (read various).

Thank you,

Charlie

P.S.

I'm also interested in gdb version opinions.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <6061@crl.LABS.TEK.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!news.tek.com!crl!sunshine!charliew

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11318c,48a7b230cdd26c08,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid11318c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,48a7b230cdd26c08,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-01-04 17:34:29 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!news.tek.com!crl!sunshine!charliew
From: charliew@sunshine.LABS.TEK.COM (Charles Wilson)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,gnu.gcc.help
Subject: Which version of gcc is "best"(2.5.7)?
Message-ID: <6061@crl.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 5 Jan 94 00:45:37 GMT
Sender: news@crl.LABS.TEK.COM
Followup-To: poster
Distribution: gnu
Lines: 22