Re: Ghostscript and Turbo-C v2.0

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #521

#521

From: Bob Knight
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 1989 12:55

15 lines
1127 bytes

In article <15955@pollux.UUCP> merlin@smu.edu (David Hayes) writes:
>I have Turbo-C 2.0, but I haven't been able to get Ghostscript to
>compile in accordance with the instructions in make.doc.  My object
>files all seem to be 270 or so bytes, regardless of the size of the
>source file.  OBJXREF says they contain no symbols, and reference no
>symbols.
>
>Does anyone have the foggiest idea what's going on here?  Thanks,

Yup, I do.  The files in the tar file are *unix* files, not DOS files.
You must convert them to unix files by adding a <CR> before the <LF>
at the end of the source lines.

Good luck,
Bob

Technical Details

Message-ID: <10567@csli.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!csli!knight

References: <15955@pollux.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!csli!knight
From: knight@csli.Stanford.EDU (Bob Knight)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,gnu.ghostscript.bug
Subject: Re: Ghostscript and Turbo-C v2.0
Message-ID: <10567@csli.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 6 Oct 89 12:55:08 GMT
References: <15955@pollux.UUCP>
Sender: knight@csli.Stanford.EDU (Bob Knight)
Reply-To: knight@csli.stanford.edu (Bob Knight)
Followup-To: gnu.misc.discuss
Organization: Barton Industries ITSD, Santa Fe, NM
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message