Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #62903Re: I would use hurd.
From: Bill Bogstad
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 1995 00:00
18 lines
1477 bytes
1477 bytes
In article <ARTK.95Apr2100356@cc-color1.Congruent.COM>, Arthur Kreitman <artk@Congruent.COM> wrote: >In article <WILLIAMS.95Mar28223531@martha.utcc.utk.edu> williams@martha.utcc.utk.edu (Myles Williams) writes: > >[lots of suggestions about other systems besides hurd that can do wonderful >things with an emphasis on OSF/1 and its 'freeness'.] I tried to send you email asking where to find out more about the availability of OSF/1 and never got a response. I managed to locate information about it on their ftp server. At least at this time, the only thing that is available is their version of the MACH micro-kernel. They claim that a set of XPG3(?) compliant server programs will be available around the end of this year. Until they are released, a free OSF/1 remains just as much vaporware as HURD. I see no reason to be more or less skeptical of OSF/1 then I am of Windows 95 or HURD... Bill Bogstad bogstad@cs.jhu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3lpf1d$mth@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<82125@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <WILLIAMS.95Mar28223531@martha.utcc.utk.edu> <ARTK.95Apr2100356@cc-color1.Congruent.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,27e0a295ed4288ab X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public From: bogstad@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu (Bill Bogstad) Subject: Re: I would use hurd. Date: 1995/04/03 Message-ID: <3lpf1d$mth@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu> X-Deja-AN: 100837907 references: <82125@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> <WILLIAMS.95Mar28223531@martha.utcc.utk.edu> <ARTK.95Apr2100356@cc-color1.Congruent.COM> organization: The Johns Hopkins University, Computer Science Department newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss