🚀 go-pugleaf

Arthur Kreitman (artk@Congruent.COM) wrote:

:   That statement is so far off base it isn't even wrong.  The binary has
: been released, and there are no restrictions on its reproduction.

Maybe we are talking about different dll's. I meant the one needed for
gcc to work.

:   All of our customers can get all source code any time they want at no
: charge without asking us.  And it requires no work on their part.  It 
: couldn't be much easier.

The easiest way is to ship all, source and binary, on a CDROM. It is
my understanding is that you did that at first, then switched to a
binary only, floppy distribution. It is further my understanding that
your customers have to use a mailserver to obtain the source.

If the above is inaccurate, please provide details.

:    Subterfuge, you mean like hiding behind a guest account with no signature?

No, I mean subterfuge like ignoring the part of my message asking for the
details of your discussion with the FSF.