Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #63405Re: uunet as a contact for the LPF smacks of favoritism.
From: Mike Stump
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 22:53
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 22:53
54 lines
3331 bytes
3331 bytes
In article <hjbD3Gw79.8Bt@netcom.com>, Hwa-Jin Bae <hjb@netcom.com> wrote: >wrong. a lot of cygnus customers i know, and a lot of potential customers >do not understand this issue clearly. There are many possibilities. Some might not understand because they have never asked, some might not understand because they read this newsgroup and become too confused about what is the true and what isn't. Some might not know because they don't care to know. Some might not know because we hanen't put forth the effort they need to understand all the complexities. This last may be in part, due to our overloading, our oversight or our expectation that they can grasp complex things as quickly as our `normal' customers. Do you hold Cygnus responsible for educating people that don't care to be? Do you hold them responsible for not having an in depth education program that all prospective customers must read? Please state the number of Cygnus Customers that you know that want to understand the issue of their ability to put the software up on the net for anonymous ftp that don't understand the issue, that have asked Cygnus Support for help in understanding that Cygnus has failed to follow through in helping them understand as completely as they wish. If your answer is zero, then please explain why we should consider your statement anything other than a raw flame. >some potential customers do not understand the nuances of the GNU >license, This is a true statement. If they want to, they can. They can ask here, they can ask the FSF, they can ask their lawyers, they can even ask Cygnus Support. Do you think Cygnus should be held responsible for ensuring that all customers and potential customers understand the nuances of the GNU license? >and assume that cygnus software can be only gotten from them. The assumptions that they make are there own. >this is further re-inforced by the cygnus' marketing brochures and >info packs. Ok, let's get real for a second. In some sense Cygnus Software _can_ in fact only be gotten from Cygnus Support. This is a plain and simple fact. If you don't like it, I am sorry. Some of the marketing material is based upon this fact. Now, do you wish to claim this is not a fact, but rather is untrue? If you accept this as true, what is your complaint of the marketing material? I think I just don't understand. If you don't accept this as true, please let me know, and I can give you references to code that people can only get in one of our releases.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<D3Ju8q.3Lr@kithrup.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.ge.com!news.drexel.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.cygnus.com!kithrup.com!mrsReferences:
<3gbuc0$ptd@umd5.umd.edu> <hjbD3C7xy.6sM@netcom.com> <D3GCp9.xx@kithrup.com> <hjbD3Gw79.8Bt@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,16f9059ee24a2cdc X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-05 14:53:14 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.ge.com!news.drexel.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!msunews!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!news.cygnus.com!kithrup.com!mrs From: Mike Stump <mrs@cygnus.com> Subject: Re: uunet as a contact for the LPF smacks of favoritism. Sender: mrs@kithrup.com (Mike Stump) Organization: Cygnus Support Message-ID: <D3Ju8q.3Lr@kithrup.com> References: <3gbuc0$ptd@umd5.umd.edu> <hjbD3C7xy.6sM@netcom.com> <D3GCp9.xx@kithrup.com> <hjbD3Gw79.8Bt@netcom.com> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 1995 22:53:14 GMT Lines: 54