Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #675Re: NAND -- Not ANother DOS
From: Miles O'Neal
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 15:27
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 1989 15:27
16 lines
1103 bytes
1103 bytes
In article <Dec.8.02.22.48.1989.11490@elbereth.rutgers.edu> bschwart@elbereth.rutgers.edu (some great stormfowl, whenever he has walked his while) writes:
|
|If you _really_ want to stick it to the hoarders,
|get 'em where it _really_ hurts. UN*X is elite, but MiSeryDOS
|is ubiquitous. How's about if the FSF or some other outfit
|(say the "FPW" I suggest in another article) takes on a "NAND"
|project--"Not ANother DOS"? Something *FREE* that runs
While I agree in principle, I'd FAR rather see the effort go into
producing/distributing something that will wipe DOS off the face
of the earth (and OS/2 with it).
Even if that something has to carry the CopyLeft... 8^)
-Miles O'Neal
{yr fave backbone here}!emory!stiatl!meo
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8089@stiatl.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!emory!stiatl!meoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!telly!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!emory!stiatl!meo From: meo@stiatl.UUCP (Miles O'Neal) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: NAND -- Not ANother DOS Message-ID: <8089@stiatl.UUCP> Date: 8 Dec 89 15:27:03 GMT Organization: Sales Technologies Inc., "The Little Shop of Horrors..." Lines: 16