Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #71932Copyleft & commercial org.s question
From: Morgan Woodson
Date: Tue, 26 May 1992 09:42
Date: Tue, 26 May 1992 09:42
25 lines
1696 bytes
1696 bytes
Free Software Fans- There's been some discussion on commercial interests working with FSF, but I missed the beginning of the thread. I've had a question about this that's bothered me for a while: Motorola has developed a whiz bang optimizing compiler for the 56001 digital signal processor based on GCC. Their DSP newsletter claims that they are giving away source in accordance with copyleft. I called a Moto. sales rep. and he said that source was only given to people who purchase the binaries for around $700. The source doesn't include Moto.'s modifications, so it seems that it's the same thing available from GNU's ftp sites. So, my questions: Does this jive with the copyleft? If the source is not only the regular GCC distribution, if I buy the compiler and request the source (& pay media fee), can I give away the source? Is the binary copyrightable by Motorola, or does it fall under copyleft? There's a lot of GCC's code in there! Can I buy it for $700, then give it to all my friends because Moto. cannot legally hold copyright? Thanks, Morgan --> woodson@cse.ucsc.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35974@darkstar.ucsc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!darkstar!woodsonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,99097cebd07b3a04,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-05-26 06:15:44 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!darkstar!woodson From: woodson@cse.ucsc.edu (Morgan Woodson ) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Copyleft & commercial org.s question Message-ID: <35974@darkstar.ucsc.edu> Date: 26 May 92 09:42:36 GMT Article-I.D.: darkstar.35974 Sender: usenet@darkstar.ucsc.edu Organization: University of California, Santa Cruz (CE/CIS Boards) Lines: 25