Re: About the GNU's project's path

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72158

#72158

From: BRUCE
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1992 15:22

13 lines
1293 bytes

Re using imake vs configure.

I don't see any problem in using configure once all of the tools are
in the same framework.  The configure supplied with libg++-2.0 for
example can configure all tools to use /usr/gnu in one go.  It's just
a matter of time before the remainder of the tools are set up properly.

Changing to using Imakefiles at this point would involve lots of work, I
imagine, whereas switching the rest of the tools to configure involves less.
--
Bruce Stephens, Centre for Mathematical Software Research
Bruce Stephens, Centre for Mathematical Software Research
University of Liverpool, UK.  bruce@uxb.liverpool.ac.uk

Technical Details

Message-ID: <92080.152217BRUCE@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!lucsand!liv!bruce

References:

<1853@tansei1.tansei.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp><CARLTON.92Mar16121319@husc8.harvard.edu ><1992Mar17.004430.16266@uunet.uu.net><CARLTON.92Mar17090828@husc8.harvard.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,5777663c09aadc80
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-21 02:27:01 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!lucsand!liv!bruce
From: BRUCE@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: About the GNU's project's path
Message-ID: <92080.152217BRUCE@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Date: 20 Mar 92 15:22:17 GMT
References: <1853@tansei1.tansei.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp><CARLTON.92Mar16121319@husc8.harvard.edu
 ><1992Mar17.004430.16266@uunet.uu.net><CARLTON.92Mar17090828@husc8.harvard.edu>
Distribution: gnu
Organization: University of Liverpool
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message