Re: Too Good to be True?

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72251

#72251

From: Greg Lindahl
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1992 03:52

11 lines
1119 bytes

In article <1ca2FB25w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) writes:

> The FSF thinks derivative works MUST be
>subject to the same conditions as the originals; I don't.  I think people
>should be given the choice.

No, the law says that the copyright owner owns their code. Are you
advocating theft? You can't use someone else's code without their
permission.
--
Signature virii are lame.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Feb13.035216.18207@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!gl8f

References: <1992Feb10.225152.25622@uunet.uu.net> <1ca2FB25w164w@mantis.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-12 22:09:55 PST
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Subject: Re: Too Good to be True?
Message-ID: <1992Feb13.035216.18207@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia
References: <1992Feb10.225152.25622@uunet.uu.net> <1ca2FB25w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Distribution: world,public
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1992 03:52:16 GMT

Reply to Parent Message