Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72257Re: How to charge for supporting free software?
From: Mike Richardson
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1992 14:54
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1992 14:54
46 lines
2986 bytes
2986 bytes
In article <kp6biiINNgfv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> chased@rbbb.Eng.Sun.COM (David Chase) writes: >These some examples of where custom service is not value-added. I >don't know if these are the common cases, but I suspect that they are. I regularly rebind keys under emacs to perform a specific function that I need to do for an hour. The most important key on my keyboard is the one bound to global-set-key. >The FSF arguments regarding look-and-feel cut both ways -- what good >is a customized typewriter keyboard? When faced with a brain damaged PC keyboard, or new-style Sun keyboard? It has a lot of advantages. >particularly what I want to pay for on a regular basis. When I get my >car repaired, I do go someplace where I like the service, but I regard >it as a defect in the car that it needs service at all. You are dreaming if you think that a complex mechanism like your car is going to stay in top shape without service. I wish there was someone around that would be willing to come and service my refridgerator -- I don't like the way the ice-maker works. I'd sure like to get someone in to remove it. The fridge came with the house, and works just fine otherwise. >Presumably, the bigger picture has appeared to you. Can you provide >examples of where "quality service for software products" is an >interesting (i.e., profit-making) concept? > >David Chase >Sun I dunno, how about Sun? I'd pay for Sun 3/60 software support since I have one in my basement. I could probably do a lot of the support myself if I had kernel source, but I know plenty of people that could use a used 3/60 (rather than a silly MSDOS clone), and could get one cheaper than the clone, but for whom support is an issue. When the GNU Hurd is available for 3/60s and 386s, I think that Interactive, SCO and Sun are going to find themselves in significant competition from the consultants. People hire consultants to help them with current commerical Unix offerings as it is. If the software has no original cost, and doesn't have a price that scales with the number of copies bought it sure makes the consultant a lot more competitive. Being able to offer custom modifications, instant bug fixes or enhancements is something that I wish we could do now.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Feb14.145405.15029@cunews.carleton.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!utgpu!cunews!wcscpsReferences:
<6FEB199211575588@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov> <RSW.92Feb7021143@delay.cs.brown.EDU> <kp6biiINNgfv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,bdca0b6276a5ee32 X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-14 07:18:52 PST Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!utgpu!cunews!wcscps From: wcscps@alfred.carleton.ca (Mike Richardson) Subject: Re: How to charge for supporting free software? Message-ID: <1992Feb14.145405.15029@cunews.carleton.ca> Sender: news@cunews.carleton.ca (John Stewart) Organization: Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada References: <6FEB199211575588@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov> <RSW.92Feb7021143@delay.cs.brown.EDU> <kp6biiINNgfv@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1992 14:54:05 GMT