Re: Too Good to be True?

Article View: gnu.misc.discuss

Article #72263

#72263

From: From A to B
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1992 18:39

22 lines
1417 bytes

gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
> In article <1ca2FB25w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) 
> > The FSF thinks derivative works MUST be
> >subject to the same conditions as the originals; I don't.  I think people
> >should be given the choice.
> 
> No, the law says that the copyright owner owns their code.

Derivative works don't just contain the original copyright owner's code.

> Signature virii are lame.

So are semi-literate .signatures.  That's "viruses".


mathew

-- 
Hail Eris! / "Our whole economy's based on fear and death; how long can we get
away with this?" --- Jello Biafra / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! /
PGP RSA public key available on request / Desperately seeking Negativland's U2
CD / Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices

Technical Details

Message-ID: <0ND6FB3w164w@mantis.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew

References: <1992Feb13.035216.18207@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d
X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-15 04:23:20 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (From A to B)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
Subject: Re: Too Good to be True?
Message-ID: <0ND6FB3w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: 14 Feb 92 18:39:20 GMT
References: <1992Feb13.035216.18207@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Distribution: world,public
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
Lines: 22

Reply to Parent Message