Article View: gnu.misc.discuss
Article #72372Re: Too Good to be True?
From: Lieutenant 030
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 16:14
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 16:14
53 lines
2943 bytes
2943 bytes
burley@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Craig Burley) writes: > In article <Pi1eFB7w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) w > > OK. Suppose I am a user. Suppose I have just obtained a copy of GNU Emac > What rights does the GPL give me over and above those I would have if GNU > Emacs were public domain? > > The rights to the source code, for a nominal fee, and to share that source > code with others. I would have those rights if it were PD. Elvis is PD; I have the source code, I got it at no cost, and I can share it with other people. > to support. You can't obtain a copy of GNU Emacs for the Mac (if such a thin > exists) without also ending up with the rights to obtain the source code > for that _exact port_ (not just "original EMACS, but we threw in a lot of > special Mac code to make it work, and we don't want you to see that stuff"). False. The extra code could be put into a library. People could then sell that library, and also distribute a modified version of GNU Emacs which calls the commercial library in order to gain access to Mac toolbox functions. > Therefore, when you get GNU EMACS vs., say, a PD EMACS, you have the followin > additional rights (and you already know about all the "subtractional" rights) > > - You get the source, or at least access to it for a nominal fee for > up to three years > > - You can share the executables and/or source with others (i.e. > redistribute) > > - You can modify the source and build derivative versions > > - As long as you give these rights to others, you can distribute (for > profit or for free) the modifications and/or derivative versions to > others I can do all those with PD Emacs. > By the way, I see no reason why someone can't ship "highly proprietary" > (i.e. licensed) source and/or objects separate from GPL-protected source, > but intended for use when linked in with such code. So you agree with my "Emacs for the Mac" example above? mathew -- Hail Eris! / "Our whole economy's based on fear and death; how long can we get away with this?" --- Jello Biafra / Message for Kodak: Bring back Dan Bredy! / PGP RSA public key available on request / Desperately seeking Negativland's U2 CD / Just another would-be Mac owner put off by Apple's monopolistic practices
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<qasXFB4w164w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<BURLEY.92Feb4222629@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,e71af1b1f401c58d X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-02-10 12:49:55 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Lieutenant 030) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss Subject: Re: Too Good to be True? Message-ID: <qasXFB4w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 10 Feb 92 16:14:25 GMT References: <BURLEY.92Feb4222629@geech.gnu.ai.mit.edu> Distribution: world,public Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 53